CNN.com recently posted an article about how consumers often underestimate the calories contained in fast food. The point of the study is simple: portion are getting larger, and people don’t quite get the effect of larger portions on calorie intake.
Yes, that’s true. My unscientific observations of Americans point to value over quality. It seems like more Americans will go for the cheap and fast option for dining over the healthy and slow option, especially if you can add more fries for a couple of quarters. More for your money, right?
Dieticians claim that a single serving of meat should be no larger than a deck of cards. I implore you to find a serving of meat anywhere that is the size of a deck of cards… even child portions are at least the size of a jumbo deck these days.
But the real point here is… should we be more concerned with calories or fat? While it is true that calories can cut down fat and sugar levels in the bloodstream, what’s the fastest way to health?
- Cut out saturated fats
- Cut out cholesterol
- Exercise moderately each day
- Drink more water
- Laugh
This all reminds me of a story a friend once told me after a lunchtime trip to Subway, back when the chain was touting how you too could be like Jared if you just ate at Subway. Woman in front of my friend orders a sandwich:
- 12 inch meatball sub on white bread
- Cheese
- Ranch dressing
- Diet Coke
The woman tells the server, “I’m trying out the Subway diet to lose weight.”
The server politely says, “Honey, that’s not a diet sub.”
Case closed. Calories aren’t the problem; it’s our mindset. You can’t have your cake and eat it too, unmetaphorically speaking.
technorati tags: health, consumerism, obesity